This http://www.westonaprice.org/federalupdate/aa2009/06feb09.html prompted me to write to my Congressman participating in the House Energy and Commerce Committee (Ed Markey). If this issue is important to you, please do the same. :)
Page Summary
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 04:52 pm (UTC)I clicked on the link and found it to be about raw milk.
I'm curious to understand your position on raw milk and pasteurization. I understand people not wanting to eat milk that has growth hormones added or is not organic, but I don't understand the anti-pasteurization concept. It doesn't add or remove anything to the milk, it just keeps it from spreading food-bourne illness, is what I've always thought. I know the basic ideas outlined here:
http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/2004/504_milk.html
but that of course must be opposite your position. What is it about pasteurization ("destroys the enzymes"? etc) that makes you feel that its not "real food" (your title to your post)?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 04:57 pm (UTC)We've been buying raw (grass fed) milk for about 9 months now and have been very happy with it (aside from health benefits, Brian is able to drink it being lactose intolerant). I've had friends drinking it for a while, but it was seeing Alton Brown's Good Eats on Dairy, reading http://www.amazon.com/Real-Food-What-Eat-Why/dp/1596911441 and Omnivore's Dilemma that pushed us over the edge ultimately.
More info on real milk:
http://www.realmilk.com/why.html
no subject
Date: 2009-02-26 11:17 pm (UTC)thanks!!!! :)